Comments

Name the West Hampstead Square towers — 19 Comments

  1. or, in honour of our (probably closed by then) fire station…

    Pugh, Pugh, Barney McGrew, Cuthbert, Dibble and Grubb.

    (I know that is only 6 names and one is repeated, but at least it is most of them covered).

  2. Sorry to be a killjoy but I actually think they should stick with letters of the alphabet (A, B, C etc.) as it's much easier for people to locate the building they are looking for. I know it's a bit boring but it's practical and surely that's the most important thing?

    • You must love Alphabet City on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. I suspect people can probably cope with working out which building they want with the aid of some sort of signage, or the names could start with consecutive letters of the alphabet?

      Personally I think A…G enforces the idea that it’s a separate development with its own internal logic, rather than something that’s part of the area. I’d even prefer 1…7, which would be more consistent with them being buildings off a street.

    • Ok so Alphabet City and USA street names in general (e.g. 24th St) are pretty boring and I much prefer our street names but I think that’s slightly different to naming individual blocks.

      Could you imagine how difficult it would be to find an address if every house in every street had a name rather than a number? Many villages have addresses like this and it can take ages to find the address you’re after.

      I’ve lost count of how many times people have walked up to me in West Hampstead asking if I know where so and so mansion/house is.

      If you’re looking for block F (or 6), you know it’s going to be after E (or 5). If you start giving blocks names then you often have to look at a map/sign to find out where you’re destination is.

      Having spent years travelling to many different addresses everyday, I can’t begin to tell you how frustrating it is trying to find buildings that have names rather than numbers (or letter). It makes things so much more confusing and wastes a lot of time. I’m sure anyone who has to regularly travel to new/unknown addresses would agree.

      Personally practicality is much more important than, well, vanity but I do think you’ve done very well to get Ballymore to agree to do this, so good on you for convincing them to let the local community decide.

      I don’t think giving each block a number or letter will make them feel like they are separate developments but the way the developers have divided the “affordable” housing and private housing probably will (but then we couldn’t have different classes mixing now, could we?)

    • Generally agree, and if it was a larger, or less linear development, I’d sympathise with the plight of those trying to find their way. However, for 7 buildings in a row, accessed by one road only I don’t think it’s going to give anyone a headache to read signs with words on them any more than signs with letters/numbers on them

      My idea isn’t to make each individual block feel integrated – no question that the whole development will feel coherent – rather to make the development as a whole more integrated with the rest of West Hampstead. I know it’s probably futile, but worth trying.

      Totally agree with you about the affordable/private segregation, even understanding why RSLs prefer aggregation of units. Nevertheless, it’s a shame they’re all consigned to the narrowest furthest part of the development

  3. How about after some distinguished residents of the past…Evelyn Waugh, Thomas Hardy, A. A. Milne, George Orwell, T. S. Eliot and H. G. Wells. Thats only 6… maybe we can throw in Thompson Towers for Emma Thompson as she's such a proud Whamper?? Or Victoria Mansions as this is where Queen Victoria used to stroll when it was rolling countryside. Very regal indeed!

  4. The prize will be a 3-course dinner with a tasting glass of wine paired with each course.

    We're excited to be involved – good luck one and all!

    (Personally – crossing fingers for names that tell West Hampstead's story!)

  5. Any luminaries whose names were adopted by these ugly, ugly, ugly buildings (sorry, I like my architecture old-fashioned and traditional) will turn in their graves. All I can come up with is ugly, uglier, ugliest and then something rude, ruder and rudest for the next three, and then, oh, I don’t know. They are truly horrible. I wouldn’t want to live in one and am sorry I’ll have to look at them every day when I walk down WEL.

  6. They should be called posh boys names as a reflection of the only sector of society who can seemingly afford to buy a house in the area:

    Quentin
    Hugo
    Sebastian
    Tarquin
    Rufus
    Fabian
    Tobias

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>