Is Abercorn School hedging its bets?

It’s been several months since Abercorn School announced it was interested in moving into the vacant ground-floor unit at Alfred Court – a formal application has been submitted, but is this just a backup plan?

The private school based in St John’s Wood was looking for somewhere to expand and seemed to think that this site, in the modern bulding that overlooks Fortune Green, would be a viable option. Initial resident feedback wasn’t overwhelmingly positive.

No formal plans were submitted and people began to wonder whether the idea had been quietly shelved. Then, in late July an application was submitted. You can view the whole document here.

Architects’ impression from across the road

Residents have objected in no uncertain terms. Traffic is the big problem and the lengthy transport assessment document that forms part of the application has done nothing to ease locals’ concerns. I’ve added some of the main statistics and a few quotes from residents at the end of this piece.

But is all this (understandable) wailing and gnashing of teeth necessary. A letter from the High Mistress Andrea Greystoke sent to parents in early July, and kindly forwarded to West Hampstead Life, says

I promised to keep you updated on the expansion issue. We are still waiting on lawyers, planners, etc. but I can tell you that we do hope some time in the next 12 months to move our Wyndham Place pupils (Years 4-8) to magnificent premises on Portland Place. The larger space in that building will enable us to give a much enhanced offering to our older pupils. The exact timing is still uncertain—watch this space!! As you are aware this street is much closer to our existing premises than our previous option, and I hope when we do move, it will prove a seamless transition.

Are we meant to infer from this that Fortune Green, which is surely the “previous option”, is now no more than a backup plan or a temporary solution should there be problems with the Portland Place site? I am waiting to hear back from the school on this. It’s also possible that since that letter was sent out the Portland Place site has fallen through so they have had to press ahead with Fortune Green. Either way, something doesn’t quite add up.

Talking of not adding up… here are some of the details on the transport situation. If you are a local resident and want to object then there’s plenty to get your teeth into.

“Due to the transport strategy, local residents on and off the site will not experience any adverse effects as predicted traffic flows will still be well within capacity of the current site access.”

Local residents disagree. Here are just three comments sent to Camden:

As a long term resident I have seen traffic and specifically parking problems exacerbate since the Council approved the whole Sager development. Ingham road is used as a parking/drop off place for Tesco customers, gym attendees and the nursery school. Buses already cannot pass each other due to the unmonitored parking.

As a local Resident I am very concerned about the drop off and pick up points from School Buses and Cars. This road is already busy at Mornings and evenings. I have read the proposed transport section and just do not believe that people will not use their cars causing chaos on Fortune green road and the adjacent roads

We are already experiencing enormous congestion and parking problems from the users of the Gym on Fortune Green Road as also people who park to shop at the Tesco store on Fortune Green Road. Not only is parking difficult through out the day but jams are caused by the volume of parking on Fortune Green Road and deliveries by Tesco lorries. A school will add still further with the inevitable large numbers of drop off and collections by parents, minibuses and buses. There is simply no capacity for this in an already very congested environment.

You get the idea.

The transport assessment goes into inordinate detail about the “pick-up/drop-off strategy”, which involves parents driving into the basement car park and number plate recogntiion technology alerting school staff as to which child they have to go and meet (the youngest children are 8, not 5). Hard to imagine that, despite the Bat Cave approach, most parents won’t just drop their kids off as near as they can to the front door rather than go through all that palaver.

The school’s masterplan is that most of the kids would be bussed from its other site in Abercorn Place in St John’s Wood. The theory is that most children live around there, so they can get to the Abercorn Place site as usual and then be ferried up to Fortune Green. That’s assuming that parents would prefer this, which no doubt means an earlier start, than doing the school run themselves. However, this still means three buses in the morning and three in the afternoon. The transport strategy claims that

A school bus would only stop for the minimum time required to pick up or drop off pupils who are accompanied at all times by a teacher on the bus. There is no need for a school bus to wait here.

Such punctuality would be astounding.

One reader who used to live near Abercorn Place snapped a photo of one of the buses waiting at 3.30pm outside Abercorn school. “Abercorn Place is a very wide road, and relatively traffic free, yet still the bus causes problems. It is a regular occurrence seeing these buses in these stops, and there for a significant period of time, 25 mins+”

Not driving but waiting

There’s also a strange assumption that all kids coming by public bus would take the 328, but how many actually live near the 328 bus route? Some do, most don’t. This map (click to enlarge) shows at postcode level (not address level) where existing pupils live. You can decide for yourself whether it’s optimistic to suggest that all the kids living where the blue stars are will faithfully take the school bus every day.

The transport survey is phenomenally detailed, especially if you get into the appendices. However, one group of local residents have retaliated with a pretty detailed assessment of their own that focuses (rather cleverly) less on the issues of traffic congestion and more on the emotive topic of child safety.

If you want to express your view to Camden on this, all the details are here.

5 replies
  1. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:

    I live on Weech Rd so am concerned about traffic. But also
    – I asked about outside space, their plan is to use Fortune Green as well as the nursery who use it. How about residents?
    – what about meals? Loos?
    – windows are designed for looking in. Is that suitable?
    Let’s look wider than traffic … Although let’s get left hand filter reinstated at top of F G Rd to halve tailbacks and cars zooming wrong side of road then down Weech Rd to Finchley Rd.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:

    Anyone who lives in the area should be against it. As simple as that. Transport assessment is simply crazy, local residents raised many concerns and the application says we are neutral. This school will significantly increase traffic in the area, bringing Fortune Green Road to a grid lock. Any businesses around here that think that will benefit are very very wrong, it’s quite the opposite. If there is loads of traffic, TFL will remove parking bays from FGR and people will be parking in surrounding streets bringing more chaos to local residents. Not to mention to treat West Hampstead as plan B, that is a disgrace!

    Reply
  3. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:

    I agree. This should be appealed in the strongest possible terms. The Sagar Development is the White Elephant of the area. It’s physically unattractive and I qestion why we as residents have to suffer for the fact that they can’t shift the flats. The building was not designed to be a school. I have major concerns over the impact on the additional traffic in this road- as it is it can barely cope, not to mention the emissions, noise, the safety and educational needs of the children

    Reply
  4. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:

    This is the wrong location for a school. If the development had originally been designed to include a school, it may have possibility worked but it's too late now as the building is just not suitable. I'm surprised the shop units have been empty for so long, I wonder why this is?

    Reply
  5. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:

    The flats are let, the retail/restaurant units are not. That is not because there is no interest. There have been offers, but Sager has refused. This is most likely to be as the school plan shifts is lucrative (lack of alternatives pushing up the price)and means Sager shifts all the units in one go and as the school lease would be for 25 years it can just wait for the money to roll in without having to deal with possibly having to find new tenants every few years. Units are deliberately being kept empty in the hope of this windfall which hopefully won’t happen…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.