Comments

Is Abercorn School hedging its bets? — 5 Comments

  1. I live on Weech Rd so am concerned about traffic. But also
    – I asked about outside space, their plan is to use Fortune Green as well as the nursery who use it. How about residents?
    – what about meals? Loos?
    – windows are designed for looking in. Is that suitable?
    Let’s look wider than traffic … Although let’s get left hand filter reinstated at top of F G Rd to halve tailbacks and cars zooming wrong side of road then down Weech Rd to Finchley Rd.

  2. Anyone who lives in the area should be against it. As simple as that. Transport assessment is simply crazy, local residents raised many concerns and the application says we are neutral. This school will significantly increase traffic in the area, bringing Fortune Green Road to a grid lock. Any businesses around here that think that will benefit are very very wrong, it’s quite the opposite. If there is loads of traffic, TFL will remove parking bays from FGR and people will be parking in surrounding streets bringing more chaos to local residents. Not to mention to treat West Hampstead as plan B, that is a disgrace!

  3. I agree. This should be appealed in the strongest possible terms. The Sagar Development is the White Elephant of the area. It’s physically unattractive and I qestion why we as residents have to suffer for the fact that they can’t shift the flats. The building was not designed to be a school. I have major concerns over the impact on the additional traffic in this road- as it is it can barely cope, not to mention the emissions, noise, the safety and educational needs of the children

  4. This is the wrong location for a school. If the development had originally been designed to include a school, it may have possibility worked but it's too late now as the building is just not suitable. I'm surprised the shop units have been empty for so long, I wonder why this is?

  5. The flats are let, the retail/restaurant units are not. That is not because there is no interest. There have been offers, but Sager has refused. This is most likely to be as the school plan shifts is lucrative (lack of alternatives pushing up the price)and means Sager shifts all the units in one go and as the school lease would be for 25 years it can just wait for the money to roll in without having to deal with possibly having to find new tenants every few years. Units are deliberately being kept empty in the hope of this windfall which hopefully won’t happen…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>